ROC’s Vikrant Reddy Joins Gingrich for #Cut50 Briefing on Capitol Hill

cut50_vikrant-newt

On January 22 on Capitol Hill, Right on Crime Senior Policy Analyst Vikrant P. Reddy addressed #Cut50, a new prison reform group, on the subject of conservative criminal justice reform. The other panelists at the event were former House Speaker and Right on Crime signatory Newt Gingrich, Senator Cory Booker, Representative Tulsi Gabbard, and Cut 50 founder Van Jones. The event was held in a room in the Senate Russell Building and drew a standing-room-only crowd of Hill staffers and other advocates.

Vikrant discussed several ideas at the panel, including performance-incentive funding for corrections facilities and programs, drug and mental health diversion courts, increased use of risk assessments, and reversing the tide of overcriminalization. He provided specific examples of how legislation to further these goals had passed in conservative states throughout the country such as Georgia, Mississippi, Ohio, and Texas. He also explained why the ideas appeal to various wings of the conservative movement, from social conservatives to fiscal conservatives to libertarians.

 Vikrant emphasized that prison reform efforts would likely be fruitless unless led by conservatives because conservatives were the ones who demonstrated a seriousness about public safety concerns in the 1960s and 70s when many liberals seemed preoccupied with rehabilitative fads that were not based in data and evidence. He specifically encouraged the enthusiastic attendees not to lose sight of the importance of public safety outcomes when advocating for prison reform. He even noted that while the work of #Cut50—the host organization—was laudable, its name was slightly problematic because it refers the goal of cutting the U.S. prison population by 50%, but improving crime rates in troubled neighborhoods are a far better measurement of success than simply the number of people released from prison.

The other members of the briefing panel were deeply engaged in the issue, but none so much as former Speaker Newt Gingrich who took several pages of notes throughout the entire event and delivered remarks heaping praise upon Chuck Colson of Prison Fellowship for bringing the issue to the forefront of conservative politics.

#Cut50 and Speaker Gingrich will hold a follow up briefing on March 26th of this year.

Share

Washington Looks Into Conservative Criminal Justice Reforms

Winds of change in criminal justice aren’t completely leaving liberal states behind. Washington is also showing interest in Justice Reinvestment. This movement was begun by the Council of State Governments and was predominately adopted by conservative states.

This strategy will help overcrowding – currently a problem for Washington – by using inexpensive evidence-based programs that divert low-risk offenders from burdensome and damaging prisons. It will also address the increase that Washington has seen in offenses, particularly worrisome as most other states are experiencing lower crime rates.

Read more here.

Share

Bipartisan Support for Juvenile Record Protections

With the Texas Legislature now in session, bipartisan cooperation is key to legislative successes.

State Rep. James White, R-Tyler, vice chairman of the Corrections Committee, has proposed an advisory committee, HB431, to explore the protections provided for juvenile records. He specifies that the committee will consist of stakeholders in the issue, such as juvenile prosecutors and defenders, probation officers, representatives from the Department of Family and Protective Services, as well as members of the general public. This group is intended to protect young offenders from harm resulting from unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential records, while ensuring public safety and due process rights.

Simultaneously, state Rep. Borris Miles, D-Houston, has filed a bill, HB263, that also moves toward sealing juvenile records, after a significant period of good behavior. This would only be available for juveniles who committed delinquent acts, or conduct in need of supervision — not juveniles deemed violent offenders.

These bills acknowledge the strong incentives that taxpayers and communities must provide in order to help those who make mistakes in their youth to start anew. Both bills focus on offenders who committed nonviolent crimes, and stress rehabilitation and opportunities, instead of a repeated cycle of criminal offenses and expenses.

Juveniles are a unique opportunity for the criminal justice system. Once someone has had contact with the system, there is a risk for a cycle of criminality. However, juveniles present the system with a great opportunity to end this cycle before it can get started. This is because juveniles are at a significant and critical time of life. If a juvenile offender takes their life in the right direction, they still have valuable educational and vocational choices still ahead of them. If they take advantage of these opportunities, they may never see the inside of a corrections facility again. Instead, they can become hard-working, contributing members of society.

However, this possibility is strongly affected by the record that follows the individual. If they are unable to get a job, or be accepted at schools that will prepare them for a successful, contributory life, then they are more likely to resort to crime again, and in an escalating fashion. Such a cycle creates new victims and raises the amount of public monies spent on this juvenile.

Both bills agree that low-risk, nonviolent juvenile offenders who have proven their desire to turn their lives around should have the opportunity to do so without forever being branded a criminal. Providing protections around their records makes it more likely that this will be the case.

There are serious considerations to be weighed when dealing with criminal records. Judicial discretion is important, and the ability for a judge to look into the specifics of a case is invaluable. However, dangerous youths who are a high-risk are very different from juveniles who have missed a few days of school or engaged in minor vandalism. There are always public safety questions at play but these bills work to increase public safety and save taxpayer money.

Such bipartisan collaboration shows a public tired of funding a prison system that cycles criminals through without addressing safety or costs. It also offers opportunity and redemption to youth across Texas.

Share

Ohio Examines Criminal Intent

The Daily Signal celebrates a new law passed in Ohio that requires mental culpability to be considered when crafting future statutes, and quotes tragic cases involving the lack of this protection, provided by Right on Crime’s Vikrant Reddy.

Read the article here.

Share

Right on Crime Applauds End of Equitable Sharing Program at DOJ

Outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder today announced the end of Equitable Sharing, the process through which state and local law enforcement agencies use the lower-standard federal law to bypass state law preventing/limiting asset forfeiture.

Equitable sharing splits the proceeds of forfeiture actions, allowing state and local agencies to keep up to 80% of the property’s value, with the rest going to the cooperating federal agency.

By using the federal venue (and its relatively low standard), local and state law enforcement agencies are able to circumvent state limits or prohibitions. The Washington Post claims Holder’s new order would, “eliminate virtually all cash and vehicle seizures made by local and state police from the program.”

This is not a complete stop for asset forfeiture. Exceptions exist for “dangerous” items (guns, ammunition and explosives); contraband (drugs and child pornography); as well as for assets secured by certain entities, like Joint Task Forces.

It is encouraging to see this administration beginning to respect individuals’ property rights and deferring to the precepts of federalism. While Holder’s actions will not wholly stop abuses from happening, this is certainly a positive step. States have regained some autonomy in setting – and limiting – their own forfeiture practices. We hope to see Congress forward legislation that would completely do away with the practice, rather than relying entirely upon the benign use of executive discretion.

Share