Community Based Re-Entry in Detroit and Cleveland

One of the most important and fundamental aspects of an effective criminal justice system is proper reentry that ensures public safety is protected while successfully transitioning an offender from prison to the free world. To achieve these dual goals, two jurisdictions have adopted novel community-centered approaches to reentry.

In Detroit, with a program nicknamed “New Beginnings,” police officers serve as mentors to parolees, aiding offenders in job placement and arranging for community service and volunteerism opportunities. Police officers also focus on the old habits that put the parolees in prison in the first place, and coping mechanisms for their new lives, such as anger management techniques. The program participants hope that changing an offender’s attitude about law enforcement and helping him to see a police officer as an ally may increase the likelihood of desistance.

New Beginnings is an example of focusing reentry on both public safety, via supervision and daily contact with law enforcement, and successful transitioning, due to the job placement and mentoring.

In Cleveland, “Breaking the Cycle” focuses first and foremost on job placement. Given the evidence that demonstrates the correlation between high employment rates among ex-offenders and decreased recidivism rates, Cleveland’s focus on employment is well-placed. Further, Breaking the Cycle seeks to be realistic with offenders about what employers expect and the beliefs held about ex-offenders.

Both New Beginnings and Breaking the Cycle are community oriented reentry programs that go beyond the supervision usually found in parole programming and instead seek to put offenders to work and keep them out of prison for good.

Ohio Bill Could Improve Job Options for Ex-Cons

Ohio Senate Bill 337, which is designed to lower barriers to employment for ex-cons, was recently passed by both chambers of the Ohio legislature and sent to Governor John Kasich’s desk to be signed into law. The Marion Star reports:

There are more than 49,000 inmates in Ohio prisons. Ohio Senate Bill 337, if passed, would change the way ex-cons are able to gain employment once released from prison. . . . [I]t also would give employers who hire ex-offenders protection from being held liable for negligent hiring.

The bill is designed to keep “collateral sanctions” – a penalty, disability or disadvantage that is related to employment or occupational licensing as a result of a guilty plea or conviction – from fully preventing employment.

Those convicted of crimes such as theft are still not going to be allowed to work as a bank teller, but ex-offenders would be allowed to take exams required to get state licenses for jobs in the construction industry.

According to Ohio Department of Corrections Director Gary Mohr, who supports the bill, these new measures should have a positive effect on public safety.

“If someone is allowed to get a job, have an income, gain the respect of his family and those around him, then that person is far less likely to commit another offense,” Mohr said. “Our goal is to get these people gainfully employed.”

While SB 337 represents important movement in the right direction, ex-cons still face barriers to employment. The discretion to hire, or not to hire, still ultimately remains with the employer.

The full article can be found here.

Jobs for Inmates In and Out of Prison

For a prisoner exiting the corrections system, the ability to secure steady employment may determine whether he or she is able to successfully reenter society and begin a productive, law-abiding life.

In Texas and New York, two vocational programs—one for those behind bars and one for those freshly out—aim to increase the odds that an ex-inmate will be gainfully employed.

The Texas Correctional Industries system includes factories in 37 prisons for over 5,000 inmates, and it produces license plates, inmate clothing, tires, signs, furniture, shoes, and repaired computer equipment. TCI boasts a recidivism rate for its longest tenured employees that is half that of the general population. It aims not only to keep prisoners busy while behind bars, but also to provide technical skills useful for the job hunt on the outside.

In New York, the Transitional Jobs program out of the Center for Employment Opportunities puts ex-offenders to work, first by learning soft work skills, then through low-skill employment. An independent evaluation of the Transitional Jobs program found that it reduced recidivism by 16 to 22 percent.

A New Re-entry Program for Florida?

In a bill recently passed by both chambers of the state legislature, Florida may have hit upon an effective way to combat high recidivism rates. The bill, now awaiting the governor’s signature, creates a new system of re-entry which will divert non-violent drug offenders who have served at least half of their sentence into community-based substance abuse treatment and education programs.

The bill would make 337 inmates eligible this year alone and at a cost of $19,469 per prisoner per year in Florida, it could lead the state to save up to $6,561,053. These savings could be just the beginning, however, because properly-structured treatment programs have proved to reduce recidivism rates dramatically. A Maryland study, for example, found that low-risk substance abuse offenders that were directed into an evidence-based probation and treatment program were 22 percent less likely to re-offend than comparable offenders who were sent to prison.

Florida taxpayers should be delighted to see that their legislators and governor are looking so carefully at the state’s recidivism problem.

Colorado Imports Intensive Reentry from Canada

In Colorado, as in Texas state jails, many inmates are simply released after serving their terms without any supervision, tracking, or reentry guidance to obtain a job, housing, or solid plan for beginning a free life.

But one program in Colorado aims to change this approach—after seeing its success in Canada. The “Long-Term Offender Program” only is open to certain inmates in Colorado—those 45 and older, with a prison term of at least 15 years, and excluding sex offenders and arsonist. Inmates must have behaved well while in prison, acknowledged their crimes, and expressed remorse.

If accepted, inmates are first paired with a mentor—another former inmate who has already gone through the reentry experience and can provide first-hand guidance. The inmate then attends pre-release programming while in prison, which provides job training, develops technology skills, counseling, and seminars on families and victims. The program requires inmates to develop a “transition plan,” which specifically outlines their plans to get a job, housing, and financial issues.

At that point, a selection committee determines whether to approve the inmate to participate in a work release program, where the inmate works during the day and reports to a county jail in the evenings to sleep. If the inmate successfully completes the work release requirements, he can then transfer to a halfway house for a very small portion of the end of his or her term, a cheaper alternative to prison beds that still provide supervision. If that term is successful, the inmate can step down to an ankle monitoring system for one year, with additional parole supervision for five more years after that.

Such a gradual step-down provides intense supervision until corrections officials can have more assurance that ex-offenders are ready for a life beyond bars. In addition, the focus on gainful employment and steady housing can prevent two of the biggest predictors of recidivism (joblessness and homelessness) from affecting this class of offenders.

This program emerges as other states, and even the federal government, consider more intensive reentry programming as a way to reduce recidivism and put ex-offenders on the right track.

Colorado Legislators Take on “Collateral Consequences”

Conservatives in Colorado should be paying close attention to new legislative efforts to address a problem that is ignored far too often: collateral consequences.

Late last year, National Review published a piece by Mitch Pearlstein, in which he explained that “[c]ollateral sanctions [or consequences] include any legal penalty, disability, or disadvantage imposed automatically upon conviction: for example, ineligibility for various jobs, such as school-bus driver or property manager for an apartment building. Collateral consequences encompass the full range of bad things and debilitating restrictions—official or unofficial, codified or not—that regularly confront people after they’ve served their sentences.”

Interestingly, Pearlstein noted that collateral consequences, which some lawmakers applaud, have a detrimental effect on marriage rates, and in the long run, this problem likely contributes to increased recidivism: “Research verifies common sense by showing that married men are less likely than single men to break the law. Getting married is thus a good way for a man to help himself avoid getting locked up. But what about single men who have already been charged with committing crimes? They are less attractive marriage partners, not just because they may be incarcerated, but because rap sheets are not conducive to good-paying, family-supporting jobs. By not marrying, they lose a major source of support in straightening out their lives. How can they escape this trap?”

It is a significant problem and one that Colorado legislators are taking seriously. On February 13th, the Colorado Senate Judiciary Committee passed a bill which grants courts the discretion to remove various collateral consequences that affect employment, licensing, and housing for offenders who have been held accountable and served their sentences. The bill, which is known as the Restoration for People with Criminal Records Act, would also seal records of petty offenses that were not previously sealable in Colorado. Senator Pat Steadman, the sponsor, has an extensive write-up of the bill on his website. He notes, in part that “[s]tudies have shown that the biggest indicators of success after prison are stable employment and housing, [but w]ithout these supports, people released from prison are likely to be part of our unfortunately high recidivism rate.” At the February 13th committee hearing, Senator Steadman asked perhaps the most important question of all: “Does this particular prohibition on felons really make the public safer?”

Follow the progress of the Colorado bill here. It is also worth reading Professor Michael Sweig’s interesting personal testimony on the bill here.

Intensive Supervision for Young Offenders in South Carolina

South Carolina is expanding a program that focuses on young offenders—ages 17-25—who are amenable to rehabilitation and may be turned away from a life of crime.

Under South Carolina’s Youthful Offender Act, first-time offenders in that age group receive indeterminate sentences in conjunction with more intensive supervision aimed at reducing recidivism rates. Currently, this subset of offenders re-offends at a rate of 50 percent, considerably higher than the average rate for other adult offenders, which is only 30 percent.

The intensive supervision incorporates skill-building and education that is designed to ensure that the offenders have a trade and can earn a living outside of prison. The intensive supervision is also intended to build a community-based support system to ensure more effective reentry.

Smarter Parole Rules in New York

On January 1, new parole guidelines went into effect in New York. Rather than one-size-fits-all parole rules, New York will now begin classifying offenders by risk level and tailoring their supervision requirements accordingly.

New York has suffered one of the highest parole revocation rates in the nation, and the revocation reason was usually a technical parole violation rather than a new offense.

Parolees were being sent back to prison for minor rule infractions—with a hefty price tag for taxpayers—at a high rate, so New York followed the lead of other states in revamping its parole process.

Ohio Considers How to Put Ex-Offenders Back to Work

After being released from prison, ex-offenders are far more likely to stay away from law-breaking (and further incarceration) if they are employed.

Unfortunately, sometimes hundreds of jobs are denied to ex-offenders through statutes and administrative codes. In Ohio, there are an estimated 800 of these restrictions, which apply to a myriad of different employment opportunities that vary in skill, degree of sensitivity, and education required.

The Governor of Ohio, Republican John Kasich, is working with lawmakers, prosecutors, and judges to figure out which restrictions should be eliminated for certain offenders.

Kasich noted that any felony conviction precludes obtaining a commercial driver’s license, but that there are “5,000 truck driving jobs in the state of Ohio.”

Eliminating licensure restrictions for certain professions for certain ex-offenders will increase the number who stay out of prison and lead productive, law-abiding lives. This means higher rates of employment, and it also means less money spent by the government on corrections and social services.

NYT: Perry Displays Varied Stance Toward Crime

A feature story in the New York Times today digs to discover Texas Governor Rick Perry’s record on criminal justice, highlighting a tenure that contains within it a number of reform elements that are in broad concurrence with the principles advocated by Right on Crime.